From the NY Times...
"Television evangelist Pat Robertson said Monday on his live news-and-talk program ''The 700 Club'' that Islam is not a religion of peace, and that radical Muslims are ''satanic.''
Robertson's comments came after he watched a news story on his Christian Broadcasting Network about Muslim protests in Europe over the cartoon drawings of the Prophet Muhammad.
He remarked that the outpouring of rage elicited by cartoons ''just shows the kind of people we're dealing with. These people are crazed fanatics, and I want to say it now: I believe it's motivated by demonic power. It is satanic and it's time we recognize what we're dealing with.''
Robertson also said that ''the goal of Islam, ladies and gentlemen, whether you like it or not, is world domination.''"
Pat, Pat, Pat...
Lots of folks might think that YOUR followers are also "crazed fanatics" whose goal is "world domination." Should we bring back the Inquisition? What is it about politics that encourages religious extremists, both Islamic and Christian?
Jesus said "Love your neighbor as yourself." If someone came up to you and told you that you have to worship in only one, approved way, and that way conflicted with your own beliefs, wouldn't you resist? Isn't that the basis for KEEPING religion and state separate? Mutual respect, remember that? Jesus also said, "Let he who has ears to hear, listen." He was acknowledging that people have a free will to believe as they wish, and that it doesn't give anyone the right to impose one set of beliefs over another's. Jesus DID say to teach the Gospel, He DIDN'T say to FORCE people to listen and believe in them.
Let me just say that I DO believe in God, I just have a hard time with organized religion. There are too many different religions that ALL share the same basic moral belief system of "Love your neighbor as yourself" that I think it impossible to say that only one particular brand is the right one. I feel that they are all different manifestations, and that those who insist on one over the others are merely interested in advancing their own agenda. Even tracing back Catholicism, the doctrines that are followed today were imposed by the winners of the arguments set forth at Nicea or even as far back as Peter. Who's to say that THEY were right, or didn't have an agenda to push?
I like this quote from the Gospel of Thomas, one of the Gnostic Gospels that was banned by the Council at Nicea-
Jesus said, "If your leaders say to you, 'Look, the kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, 'It is in the sea,' then the fish will precede you. Rather, the kingdom is within you and it is outside you.
When you know yourselves, then you will be known, and you will understand that you are children of the living Father. But if you do not know yourselves, then you live in poverty, and you are the poverty." It seems to me that Jesus was saying that religion should be a personal belief, not subject to external interpretation or decree. That's how I believe, and there isn't anyone who's going to force me to believe that gays are evil, or that abortion is wrong for everyone, or that women can't be priests. (BTW, I'm not crazy about abortion, and don't feel that it should be used as a form of contraception. At the same time, I have no great need to legislate my belief on someone else. There's that pesky "Let he who has ears to hear, listen" stuff again! I also have no use for those who would criminalize abortion on one hand, and cut back on supporting that child once born.)